Monday, July 17, 2017

Personal Responsibility is Selfishness

“Personal responsibility” is a phrase I hear all too often. Typically it’s used as a coded phrase for selfishness, a lack of empathy, and ignoring the fact that being part of society requires acknowledging our shared responsibilities towards one another. As I see it, personal responsibility is unpatriotic and un-Christian, at least when taken to the extremes it so commonly is these days.

Now, personal responsibility doesn’t sound so bad on the surface. And it isn’t. Taking responsibility for your own actions and life choices is a necessary part of being an adult human being. Failure to do so often amounts to laziness and immaturity, two traits I know intimately. It’s important I acknowledge that before I go railing against personal responsibility. Personal responsibility isn’t exactly a terrible ideal devoid of any redeeming qualities. Rather, personal responsibility is important. It’s something I often don’t take seriously enough. But it’s also a cheap façade trying to hide dismantling Medicaid and protections for people with pre-existing conditions behind something more palatable. It’s the source informing a lot of misguided and malicious ideas about how society should work and how we should treat one another.

With regards to healthcare, “personal responsibility” seems to mean a complete disregard for others and a focus solely on oneself or one’s family. I’ve been told my own cancer treatment isn’t worth it, that it’s too expensive and unfairly burdens other people. I’ve been chastised online for daring to say that I should be able to have health insurance, since insurance companies covering expensive treatments like what I need for my cancer means other people might have to spend a little more on their own coverage. As if that isn’t the basic principle of how insurance works. Someone just last week told me they find it “hard to even relate” to my fear of losing my life-saving coverage, because they are spending too much on health insurance. As if spending too much money is remotely comparable to losing access to the treatment keeping your chronic cancer managed. I’ve been told I should have planned better, been more responsible, and saved more money before I got cancer. As if anyone can plan for a cancer like mine.

Statements like these just highlight for me how so many people thoroughly fail to understand serious health issues and how unexpectedly they can arise. They make clear how little empathy so many people feel as well, and how content so many people are to disregard those whose life experiences run contrary to their preconceived notions. For me, these kinds of ill-informed to blatantly malevolent statements reveal “personal responsibility” for what it is: a lame excuse to justify selfishly ignoring others.

Such selfishness and disregard for others is far from patriotic. This might not be especially relevant if not for the fact that many of the people who said the things I mention two paragraphs above have “patriot” in their twitter bio or feature the American Flag in their profile picture. I guess some of us have vastly different ideas of what it means to be patriotic. I think it’s patriotic to happily pay a little more in taxes or health insurance if it means our country spends a little more on making society better and covering people who most need medical care. I think it’s more patriotic to want to inconvenience ourselves for the sake of the greater good than it is to post patriotic pictures of flags and bald eagles online and set off fireworks annually. I think it’s patriotic to ask what we can do for our country and our fellow citizens, not what we can do for ourselves. Personal responsibility, as it connotes today, leaves little room for patriotism.


Personal Responsibility is also egregiously un-Christian, which wouldn’t matter to the national conversation if it weren’t so often Christians, often citing their idea of Christian values, who support “personal responsibility” and “personal freedom” as guiding principles for everything from gun regulations to healthcare policy. I can’t find anywhere in Jesus’ teachings that suggest emphasizing personal responsibility as much as we do today. In fact, as I see things, it’s Christian to disregard personal responsibility. Not that Christians are called to be irresponsible, but we are implored not to worry about taking care of ourselves so much and instead focus on serving and caring for others. The Good Samaritan didn’t cross over to the other side of the road to better take care of himself, after all. Neither should we.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Where is our Empathy?

This is our ongoing healthcare debate in a nutshell, folks.




On one side we have patients who need continued protections from pre-existing condition discrimination and lifetime or annual limits for our coverage. On the other, we have extreme stinginess and selfishness that says people like me aren't worth treating, aren't worth the monetary cost, and aren't worth burden we place on society.

People with health conditions like mine are extraordinarily expensive to try to keep alive. From the perspective of strict utilitarianism or social Darwinism it doesn't make sense to save lives no matter the financial cost. But if we as a country claim that all people are equal, or if we who are Christians believe everyone bears the image of God and is equally worthy of love, we must reject such thinking. I find it odd that many of the people who support a social Darwinian approach to healthcare also view Charles Darwin as an evil, Satan-inspired figure, his ideas an attack on God. I've long rejected such notions, but now I see they hold a kernel of truth. When concepts like survival of the fittest are misunderstood and taken as prescriptions for human society, not as descriptions of the mechanisms at play in the natural world, that is indeed an attack on God and God's children.

That's how I see our current healthcare debate. We can attack those people who've had the misfortune of experience health issues at some point, or we can continue to protect and care for them while working to improve our healthcare system for everyone. We can decide people like me aren't worth covering and treating if it means everyone else pays a little more, or we can recognize that to be a part of society means to accept our shared responsibilities towards one another. That this is even up for debate right now makes me wonder when we lost our empathy, if ever we had any.

Monday, July 3, 2017

Book Update

I’m getting really excited about my book on faith and cancer. It’ll either be really good or really bad; I’m not quite sure which yet. Recently I’ve found a few publishers that want a whole manuscript, not just the first couple chapters, a formal proposal, and an outline of the rest as used to be the case, so I’ve been working on finishing up the rest of the book. I should be done with it as best as I can be without other people reading it by about the end of the week, so I’ll be looking for some beta readers soon. If reading it and giving me feedback interests you, just let me know! I have a few people lined up already but could certainly use a couple more.

This book will be part memoir, part musings on theological issues relevant to my experiences with cancer. I’ll retell my treatment history of the last two-and-a-half years, hopefully without being too dull or downbeat, while exploring ideas like why suffering happens, what prayer means, and how The Church can—and cannot—support and help people in situations like mine.  If that sounds interesting to you and you have some time in the next month or so to read and critique, just let me know and I can add you to my list of Beta readers. If that sounds interesting but you don’t have time, stay tuned in the coming months (hopefully!) for information about publication. And if this doesn’t sound interesting to you, just ignore everything I’m saying here!