This is our
ongoing healthcare debate in a nutshell, folks.
On one side
we have patients who need continued protections from pre-existing condition
discrimination and lifetime or annual limits for our coverage. On the other, we
have extreme stinginess and selfishness that says people like me aren't worth
treating, aren't worth the monetary cost, and aren't worth burden we place on
society.
People with
health conditions like mine are extraordinarily expensive to try to keep alive.
From the perspective of strict utilitarianism or social Darwinism it doesn't
make sense to save lives no matter the financial cost. But if we as a country
claim that all people are equal, or if we who are Christians believe everyone
bears the image of God and is equally worthy of love, we must reject such
thinking. I find it odd that many of the people who support a social Darwinian
approach to healthcare also view Charles Darwin as an evil, Satan-inspired
figure, his ideas an attack on God. I've long rejected such notions, but now I
see they hold a kernel of truth. When concepts like survival of the fittest are
misunderstood and taken as prescriptions for human society, not as descriptions
of the mechanisms at play in the natural world, that is indeed an attack on God
and God's children.
That's
how I see our current healthcare debate. We can attack those people who've had
the misfortune of experience health issues at some point, or we can continue to
protect and care for them while working to improve our healthcare system for
everyone. We can decide people like me aren't worth covering and treating if it
means everyone else pays a little more, or we can recognize that to be a part
of society means to accept our shared responsibilities towards one another.
That this is even up for debate right now makes me wonder when we lost our
empathy, if ever we had any.
No comments:
Post a Comment