Tomorrow we citizens of the U.S.
will choose a new President (and many other elected positions). I’m more than
ready for this election to be over so we can start the hard work of healing and
coming together again. The past year or so I've seen and heard a lot about how
this election has divided us to unprecedented extents. I don't mean to minimize
how bizarre this year has been politically, how unlike previous campaigns this
presidential race and the rhetoric surrounding it has been, but I don't think
that's quite correct. We have been more divided before—see "American Civil
War”—but that aside I'm not entirely convinced this election really has
split the U.S. in two. It seems to me that it has merely shown us how divided
we always were, deeper down, below the level of openness any of us were
comfortable with, beyond what we disclosed to others.
Sure, the divide has grown as each
side attacks the other with increasing vitriol and hate. Yes, it has gotten
much harder to find suitable places on each side of the chasm to even build the
foundations for a bridge, much less successfully span the gap between us. But
the rift between the staunch supporters of each major-party presidential candidate
was always there.
Neither major-party presidential
candidate has really inspired their followers to stand behind any new causes.
They have merely legitimized what their supporters already thought. And that,
to me, is more depressing than it is anything else. We have so much more work
to do before we really can claim to be a land of opportunity and equality for
all. Racism, sexism, bigotry, xenophobia, lies, fear-mongering, corruption, bullying,
and, at the root of it all, a blatant lack of respect for basic human dignity
have all been normalized over the course of this presidential campaign. Both sides
have played a part in some of these. One far more than the other, and I think anyone who
is honest with themselves knows which side that is, but to differing extents
both major-party candidates—and certainly their supporters—are guilty.
Perhaps it's the social convention
banning political discussion from family gatherings for the sake of getting
along that deserves some of the blame here; it certainly creates a narrative
that discussing politics and getting along are mutually exclusive. When respectful
political discourse is not a part of interacting with people we know and love,
the stage is set for election years like this. Now most political arguments
lurk in semi-anonymous social media feeds where respect is absent and people
who disagree with us are nameless, faceless "others." Perhaps if we
started discussing real issues with close friends and family more, we might
begin to realize why those on the other side think and feel as they do. They
usually have a reason.
That may be a good first step, but
it might take more than engaging in real, constructive discussions with friends
and family. I recently watched the very disappointing Independence Day: Resurgence which, though little more than an
excuse to see Jeff Goldblum and some combat between aliens and humans, raised
one very interesting point. The premise builds on the first Independence Day film, wherein aliens
come to destroy earth and are repelled by ‘Merica and Freedom (it’s not nearly as
bad as I make it sound). Twenty years later the world is at peace, having
united in the face of a threatening “other” while realizing our common humanity.
As a side note, Africa (I don’t recall a reference to a more specific locale
than the whole continent) seems to be forgotten when the world united. Warlords
there have apparently been fighting aliens in hand-to-tentacle combat since the
first movie. I’d say it’s an intentional commentary on how easily we overlook
the Third World, but I rather doubt it.
Getting back to my point here. Sometimes it takes something terrible and
different to unite people, to make people see that, compared to the new threat,
they really have a lot in common. In the Independence
Day Movies, it takes an alien invasion for us to put aside our petty
differences. Throughout history squabbling groups have allied against a third,
more different group. Human nature urges us to band together with those we consider
to be like us, the better to defend against those who are different. Viewing
the world as an "us vs. them" dichotomy is a simultaneously uniting and dividing
force. It all depends on who is in and who is out.
I suspect we will soon see many
appeals to patriotism and calls to unify the United States against ISIS, Russia,
China, or some other entity. And that’s just as sad as the division within the
U.S. right now. Those are still groups of people. I wish the ‘others’ we united
against were things like war itself, climate change, and systemic poverty. For
me, cancer is a terrible threat we should unite and rally against. There are
many other legitimate issues we must work together to solve, but casting our
fellow humans in the role of “terrible other” is dangerous at best. That’s how
we stay divided.
Repairing the growing rift between those allied with
different political parties will be difficult. Those who label themselves—or
more often label others—as “liberal” or “conservative” like those are
derogatory words seem almost beyond reconciliation. I hope that is not the
case. I hope that, whoever gets elected, we can start working together and
having real conversations about serious issues. It starts with our
conversations, our interactions with the people around us. But it must not come
at the cost of unity with people elsewhere.